correct pearson calculations

...er/evaluation/pearson/compare_pcc_with_p-value_auc_pr.png

...er/evaluation/pearson/compare_pcc_with_p-value_vus_pr.png

...earson/point/anomaly_ratio_to_performace_auc-pr_point.png

...earson/point/anomaly_ratio_to_performace_vus-pr_point.png

...ly_ratio_to_performace_with_dataset_size_auc_pr_point.png

...ly_ratio_to_performace_with_dataset_size_vus_pr_point.png

...aluation/pearson/point/pearson_vergleich_auc-pr_point.png

...aluation/pearson/point/pearson_vergleich_vus-pr_point.png

...on/pearson/seq/anomaly_ratio_to_performace_auc-pr_seq.png

...on/pearson/seq/anomaly_ratio_to_performace_vus-pr_seq.png

...maly_ratio_to_performace_with_dataset_size_auc_pr_seq.png

...maly_ratio_to_performace_with_dataset_size_vus_pr_seq.png

...r/evaluation/pearson/seq/pearson_vergleich_auc-pr_seq.png

...r/evaluation/pearson/seq/pearson_vergleich_vus-pr_seq.png

docs/TO DO LISTE.md

docs/data/Datensatz.md

docs/evaluation/Reproducibility.md

src/datensatz/dataset_investigation.ipynb

src/datensatz/pearson_correlation_coeffizient.ipynb